Militant, radical, man-hating: How our public discourse describes feminists

When Beyoncé celebrated the word feminist on Sunday night, she was working against a history of celebrities and others rejecting the label feminist. Why do so many women, famous or not, reject the term, while seeming to support the basic principles of feminism? One possible reason is the way the word has been used in the media both traditional media venues and internet websites.

Jessica Bennett asked me about the usage of the word, so in order to examine how feminist has been used by people producing television shows, radio broadcasts, magazines, newspapers, and websites, I looked at the collocates of the word feminist (including related form feminists) using two different corpora. The first is the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), which includes a variety of different media from 1990 to 2012 (I restricted my analysis to radio, television, magazines, and newspapers). The second is the Corpus of Global Web-Based English (GloWbE), which includes websites from various countries (I restricted it to US websites). The results are presented in the tables below.

feminist_coca_linguisticpulsefeminist_glowbe_linguisticpulse

The words in the tables are ranked according to the degree to which they tend to co-occur with the word feminist (or feminists). This means that each of these words shows a tendency to show up near (within 5 words to the left or the right) to feminist or feminists such that a sizable percentage of each word’s overall occurrences are near to feminist. As a rather extreme example, about 31% of all occurrences of man-hating in GloWbE are within 5 words to the left or the right of feminist.

This means that words like man-hatingradical, and militant reflect the way that producers of various types of media portray feminism and feminists. Since we often learn about the world through these people’s portrayal of it, many people have likely been influenced by these portrayals. At times feminists have applied these descriptors, particularly radical, to themselves, although even then such descriptors point to a general view of feminists and feminism as being on the fringe, making ‘unreasonable’ demands.

It’s interesting to speculate whether the efforts of people like Beyoncé will have any noticeable effect on public discourse about feminism, specifically whether it will normalize it allowing people to see its political stances for the often rather mainstream, uncontroversial positions that they are. There is already an arguably more positive view of feminism circulating in public discourse especially reflected by words like scholars and activists. Hopefully, as more data becomes available, we’ll be able to see a shift in the way the public talks about feminists and feminism.

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Language and gender, Media discourse and media bias
13 comments on “Militant, radical, man-hating: How our public discourse describes feminists
  1. […] most common terms used to talk about the word “feminist.” Yes, I did this — with the help of a linguist and a tool called the Corpus of Contemporary American English, which is the world’s largest […]

  2. […] among the most common terms used to talk about the word “feminist.” Yes, I did this — with the help of a linguist and a tool called the Corpus of Contemporary American English, which is the world’s largest […]

  3. […] among the most common terms used to talk about the word “feminist.” Yes, I did this — with the help of a linguist and a tool called the Corpus of Contemporary American English, which is the world’s largest […]

  4. eflnotes says:

    hi there

    i can’t seem to reproduce your results in COCA or GLOWBE?

    e.g. theology starts at rank 5 http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/?c=coca&q=32623548

    and no man-hating in Glowbe? http://corpus2.byu.edu/glowbe/?c=glowbe&q=32623571

    ta
    mura

  5. eflnotes says:

    doh just noticed you searched for feministS as well. i see it now in Glowbe.

  6. Hey Mura,

    I’m glad it came out this time! You scared me, haha.

    Actually, I also didn’t mention that I screened out all items that occurred less than 30 times (which might also throw you a little). Here are my two searches though for replication’s sake:

    http://corpus2.byu.edu/glowbe/?c=glowbe&q=32622182

    http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/?c=coca&q=32622020

  7. eflnotes says:

    thanks Nic! any reason to choose 30 as a cutoff?

  8. Well of course some cut-off is necessary otherwise you get a bunch of words that occur only once in COCA, and that’s not at all informative. With collocations in COCA I usually use a cutoff of at least 15. I don’t have any fantastic justification for 30 though; my main concern with lower cutoff levels for this search was that they were returning large numbers of names in which “feminist” appeared not necessarily as a general political category but part of the name of an organization. The following is characteristic of the type of things that I was getting with 20 as a cutoff in COCA and Smeal as the top collocate:

    “…said Eleanor Smeal, head of the Feminist Majority Foundation…”

  9. […] among the most common terms used to talk about the word “feminist.” Yes, I did this — with the help of a linguist and a tool called the Corpus of Contemporary American English, which is the world’s largest […]

  10. […] most common terms used to talk about the word “feminist.” Yes, I did this — with the help of a linguist and a tool called the Corpus of Contemporary American English, which is the world’s largest […]

  11. […] most common terms used to talk about the word “feminist.” Yes, I did this — with the help of a linguist and a tool called the Corpus of Contemporary American English, which is the world’s largest […]

  12. […] among the most common terms used to talk about the word “feminist.” Yes, I did this — with the help of a linguist and a tool called the Corpus of Contemporary American English, which is the world’s largest […]

  13. […] at an unusually high rate. (I’ve discussed this type of analysis, collocation analysis, here and here. I also give some more details about my analysis […]

Leave a comment

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 465 other subscribers
Follow linguistic pulse on Twitter